More stuff blowing up like in Ender's game. I thought this would be military sci-fi not some sappy moralising story.
No sci-fi and fantasy is basically all i read for pleaseure. I come for the science part of the fiction.
He included relativistic effects of time travel which i liked and i liked the way he imagined the ecosystem of the planet the story was set.
It felt cheated after the brilliant work of hard sci fi that was Ender's Game. This book was boring.
on a rank it would be 50/100
yes but people who like fantasy would love this
i liked it pretty well i just liked the first better
no i listend to it in about a week
if you like fiction then you'll love this
Historical fiction is my genre of premier interest. Scifi too, but MUST be scientifically sound.
This entire story could have been captured in one chapter and he could've expanded the story to the rebellion, other worlds, or regeneration of the queen. Instead he focuses on interpersonal relationships, religious teachings, and cultural differences in a hypothetical world. Moreover, rather than writing more sci-fi he writes social fiction expanding on the sappy belief that putting one "agreement" between the parties will solve all the world's (and by extension, the universe's) problems. What the heck happened to our hero and the story?
The female reading was more melodramatic than in Ender's Game, which dampened overall performance significantly.
War and Peace.
The latter chapters discussing open rebellion. Otherwise, this book was a bust.
Stick to the SCIENCE fiction Card!
I kind of hate Orson Scott Card personally-- at least his public persona. His politics are odious. I mention this just to put context to the following sentence:
This book is one of the finest pieces of science fiction-- or any fiction-- I have ever read.
Top Ten. As much as I enjoyed Ender's Game; the book was pretty much setup for this, and-- compared to this-- fluffy and inconsequential. My favourite parts of Ender's Game were tangled up in the side story with Ender's Siblings, which is what set the stage for Speaker.
Read Ender's Game, then read this. You won't regret it.
There are 2 trueths in life. If it were not for the dreamers, the corp. generals would have nothing to sell. The question is not what, but when and how do we get there.
and again, and again, and again
The Habara Household
Ender of course
Miro going over the fence.
Orson Scott Card
although Enders Game is his most popular book, "Speaker for the Dead" is by far his best work..
I have all the enders books, and all the Enders Shadow books except Shadows in Flight.
I have also read the Empire books and the Columbus book.
I am now reading his "Invasive Procedures"
I've read all 4 main books in the Ender's series. While "Ender's Game" is a pre-requesite for "Speaker for the Dead". The latter is certainly superior. I found the author did a good job growing the character after the first book. This is a must read for those who have read "Ender's Game".
Ender's Game was a lot better in my opinion. This book really didn't feel like a sequel as much as it did a different story that happened to take place in the same universe, with the same main character - only about 20 years older and ~3000 years later. The Hive Queen was the only aspect of this that seemed to be a continuation of the previous book.
All in all, I think it was worth the read, it just wasn't what I expected from the previous book.
The "piggies" were cool, but it is hard to take a race of tiny bipedal pigs seriously.
I just bought the third book, and plan to read that soon.
Do I recommend this book? Yes, I think that this will be a very interesting series and will give me a lot to think about for years to come.
I recommend buying this book if you do not mind a slow-paced book.
I read that Mr. Card wrote "Ender's Game" as a prequel to this book so I wish to read this one as well. I read hardcopy the "Ender's Game" as part of training on adaptive thinking (it is part of the required reading for US Army Red Team). Then, I saw the movie. This book is much different in attitude from "Ender's Game" but it is a logical flow for a former 'veteran' dealing with guilt and regret (PTSD?) as well as having a new, ‘alien’ perspective on life. The author built some interesting threads here. However, I do not expect it to become a movie.
The production was very good as well.
Tell us about yourself!
In the author’s commentary at the end of the audiobook, Orson Scott Card explains why he feels Speaker for the Dead is the book he really wanted to write when he set out to write Ender’s Game. I can’t imagine how one would set out to write the rich, humanistic tapestry of Speaker For the Dead and end up with Ender’s Game, one of the greatest military SF novels of all time yet so very different in so many ways. If you have not read or heard that the second book in the Ender’s Game series is absolutely nothing like the first book, here is your warning. This novel is set several thousand years after the events in Ender’s Game and Ender himself, thanks to the time deficit of traveling near light speed, has aged but only into his 30’s. There are no battle schools and the only battles fought are idealistic in nature. There is a deep, well written mystery to this novel that will keep you reading long after you realize there are no action or battle sequences to be had. I have known so many readers who were disappointed in this sequel to Ender’s Game but if you stick with it, I think Speaker for the Dead is actually a better, more meaningful book that explores the deeper themes introduced in Ender’s Game.
It's a Communication Thing
This story was well crafted. It started out without any apparent link to Enders Game and then it twisted back and was woven into one of the best stories I have ever encountered.
I liked Jane in this story. She is dynamic and develops as a teenager.
Well put together.