I would recommend this book to my friends because it's a great book.
Way to many books to write them all out.
He read the book well.
When Valentine Michael Smith was found.
Overall, I enjoyed the story, but it was difficult getting past all of the sexism. The comment about 9 out of 10 women being responsible for the own rape was way to much.
There is plenty to enjoy about this story and the narration is terrific. This book kept me enthralled on drives to work and I even found myself sitting in the parking lot until I reached the end of a chapter. Give it a try!
I think if you don't mind being preached at this book is for you. I felt that the main goal was to get readers into some type of wacky religion.
Something science fiction and not by this author
He did a great job
The main character
IMO I thought it was just way to out there and the ending really sucked, I was expecting something a lot better. It's like the author didn't have anything more in them for a good ending.
The narrator did a great job. It was easy to distinguish and imagine the different characters.
This is classic Heinlein: brilliant, funny, and strange. The fact that it is a bit dated should not deter anyone from listening to Christopher Hurt's wonderful performance. He does Heinlein proud.
Jubal Harshaw; and anyone who knows the book will agree.
He gives a wonderful performance.
Actually, there are so many scenes in the book that would make memorable movie scenes. I have no idea what the tag line would be,
Whether you read it or listen to it, you will enjoy this classic.
Rule 62: Don't take yourself too seriously.
I love the commitment RAH took in celebrating our humanity. He offers every opportunity to disregard taboo and really consider the living art before me.
listened to this a few years ago. ended up listening again cause I wasnt sure if I had. kept listening cause it's just that good. narration is excellent. I really believed the voices and characters
Read by Christopher Hurt and just over sixteen hours of listening.
The listener must be cognizant of the cultural morays of the time during which Strangers In a Strange Land was written … late 1950s, published in 1961. Think post WWII opulence, manual typewriters, radio news, newspapers, Eisenhower, cold war ... mom wearing a house-dress or white gloves and a girdle. The days of Mad Men, a Coffee, Tea, or Me mentality and obnoxious sexism to the extreme. There ‘ya go! The author will bring the hackles up on anyone who has a modern mindset regarding sexuality. A secondary issue is to have an open mind with regard to religion and/or religious belief.
If you can overcome these teeth-grinding bones of contention, the SciFi aspect of Stranger In a Strange Land contains many interesting and creative concepts. The man from mars is a Michaelangelo-David type adonis, innocent as a babe. His thoughts are extremely literal, he has intelligence off the chart, reads encyclopedias and dictionaries to understand the ways of mankind. He has SciFi superpowers, i.e., telekinesis, can make things and people disappear, out-of-body skills, can throw himself into a type of near-death stasis, etc. He is has very high morals and understands (groks) little of the earth or it’s inhabitants.
Thus is the foundation of a romp through the story of Stranger In a Strange Land. The story is not about the world of Mars, it is about how a man born on Mars deals with and reacts to Earth and earthlings. It’s a platform for the author to convey views, a popular methodology in fictional literature that is more suited to non-fiction, in my opinion. As opposed to being preached at, I’d rather feel entertained … this book oddly does both.
For it’s time, Stranger In a Strange Land is an okay SciFi … be tempted to throw your player across the room because of some arrogant chauvinism on the part of the author. Narration by Hurt is good, nice tempo.