I really enjoyed how the author brought the story of a most critical year in the revolution to his audience. The reading quietly portrayed the author's enthusiasm for the subject.
McCullough has done it again! His talent of making the 18th century live in our hearts and minds is truly a gift. From the very first chapter, where we see the regal splendor of King George, you can swee the world of our forefathers. Splendid reading and/or listening.
I listened to this book with high expectations. Unfortunatetly I was very disappointed. David McCullough reminds me of a grandfather plodding through his reading. The book seems to be 90% excerpts from letters whose language though interesting can be a chore to decipher. It is somewhat hard to keep track of whether he is talking about the British side or American side because all of the names are so common - Lee, Clinton, Green, Reed. There is little explanation as to the role of the Continental Congress in the proceedings. A lot of the writing seems repetitive. Though an interesting topic, I was pretty bored throughout.
The book may be a good book, but it was almost impossible to listen to as read by the author. Great authors are seldom great readers and great readers are seldom great writers. Unfortunately for this book, that was the case - the great author was a very mediocre reader.
I listened to this one on a recomendation. I don't normally pick history but he did a very good job of bringing characters to the history, and not just that of Washington himself. I was educated and engrossed.
I thought this book was a good read, interesting and a new perspective. What I didn't know was taht the author was criticised for fabricating historical evidence for some of his controversial matter. If you want an interesting audio book, its good, but if you're interested in pure history, maybe you
should look at another author. I had a web site listed where the author's facts are brought into question, but that's not allowed in a review, so look into it yourself. I believe a book that is historical non-fiction should not have elements of fiction in it, unless that is listed as its purpose.