No. I think they are both equally good for different reasons.
This is a really stupid question for a book like this; it makes me feel these questions were written by someone who never read the book. I guess as a parent I felt the most empathy for his father, but there could not really be a favorite character because everyone was only just barely peripheral to Elie.
I like the way George Guidall presented the text; his tone, timbre, phrasing, and timing really seemed to match the needs of the story.
Yes, but I couldn't.
I usually listen to audiobooks at 2x or more but I listened to this one at 1x because I wanted to catch every nuance.
I loved it. it's so sad the way he tells his story is so sad yet I love the way he tells it. although I wish he would have included what happened to him after. but either way I loved it
I have read this book at least ten times. Each time there is a lesson. Each time a new understanding. Both versions, old and new along with the commentary should be studied by every human.
I teach this book every year in class. After the first few pages the students are deathly silent and come to class each day eager to read more. Wiesel's heartfelt pleas make students sit up and take notice to what has gone on during the Holocaust. I use this book to introduce our unit on genocides and explain to them that THESE things still happen today. Hopefully, Night and books like it will foster a sense of outrage that will lead to change someday.
People say I resemble my dog (and vice-versa). He can hear sounds I can't hear, but I'm the one who listens to audiobooks.
Eliezer, the main character of Night who is mostly but (possibly) not completely the alter-ego of Elie Wiesel, has a moment, early during his Holocaust experience, where he believes, hopes, that it is all a nightmare from which he will imminently awake. He soon realizes that it is all too real, worse than a living nightmare, a relentless series of night terrors for him and his father and the people around him.
Wiesel's pared-down memoir of the Holocaust is mostly straightforward description of what he experienced, how he went from one place to the next, how he was treated, how he found food, how he survived illness, what was happening to those around him, most notably his father, with him most of the time. Only on occasion does Wiesel delve into his feelings, but when he does, that's where his account really hits home.
Worst of all are his feelings about his father. As much he strives to keep together and stay alive, he agonizes over the sense that his own chance of survival would improve if his father was not there. He feels terrible guilt about being rendered powerless to intervene when his father is mistreated. Sadly, Wiesel does not attempt to explore how his father felt about having to play the same role for his teenaged son.
There is also Wiesel's famous abandonment of God during the course of his experience, quite understandable but not nearly universal among survivors.
For me, this book was more personal. My father's experience was nearly identical -- dread of impending war overlaid by unfounded optimism among those who chose to stay (one of my father's brother emigrated to Palestine before the war), years in the ghetto (Lodz for my father), deportation by cattle car to the camps (most of my father's family died in those cars), arrival at Auschwitz and the selection process under the evil glare of Mengele, death march in mid-winter to a far-off camp, loss of a family member (sister) just before liberation.
My father rarely spoke about those things. Later in life, when he did, it was mostly about the broader events. Wiesel gets into detail, how the camps were organized, how they were supervised, how the selection process worked, how they were fed, how they dealt with each other. And how people died. I found incredible and indelible power in his spare but detailed account, punctuated by the profound of emotions about his father, his God, his guilt, about humanity and inhumanity, the survival instinct, and having to live with terrors that cannot and should not be forgotten.
There isn't much to say about this awful time that has not already been said. This book details the author's time in a concentration camp with his father; I have read other Holocaust books and each one adds something different to my understanding of this horrific time. I like the author's revelations of his inner struggles with his belief in God to his feelings about wanting to take his father's rations when his father was on the brink of death.
This audio edition includes the author's Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech and the new preface by the author. The narration was very good and added to the overall listening experience.