Literally anyone else in the world.
Every character was a trite, hackneyed stereotype. No one talks the way these characters talk... except when being exaggerated for comedic purposes. Of course the main character wall street dude is from Yale and talks like the evil preppy, upturned collar, rival high school football jock from every teen-romp comedy movie in the '80s. OF COURSE. Also, has the narrator ever actually heard a person from the south talk? Or did he just watch a bunch of Fog-Horn Leghorn episodes for his research on accents? The book itself is incredibly long and a crashing bore. Plot turns happen on complete random luck occurences (we call that lazy writing). I found myself rolling my eyes every 10 minutes or so at something that was so unbelieveably inaccurate about the financial world or about New York in the 1980s.
Not a mainstream reader.
I really like the way that Tom Wolfe wrote "The Bonfire of the Vanities." Instead of focusing on one main character throughout the extensive novel, Mr. Wolfe writes the story with many sub plots. I like it because I found it to be enjoying and not draining with the tale of one person.
There are many characters to like and dislike. The story is fast pace and engaging. As an American classic (per say), I can relate to the story more because I was familiar with the times in the 80's, New York, Wall Street and the different social classes.
Often times, when I read a classic, I sometime feel lost in the book because I wasn't born in their era of storytelling. The Bonfire of the Vanities is a good book for someone that were raise in the 80's because they can easily follow without referring back to an Encyclopaedia Britannica.
Absolutely! Great story, great narration, highly entertaining!
Great intertwining of at first seemingly unrelated characters, very interesting story, great depictions of vanity and other human foibles, wonderfully entertaining.
I have no idea.
I don't know could not tell exactly what the genre was.
Like a black and white movie when they first became talkies. Over acting.
This was a pleasant surprise. Enjoyed the dismantled modern cast system. Society is so fickle.
Toronto, Canada. Audible enthusiast since 2001.
This book was described as a modern classic and that is an apt description. It is densely packed with meaning, metaphor and issues -- perfect for studying in literature classes! None of the characters are at all likeable, which is usually a recipe for a bad book. But they are understandable, and it becomes clear through the story that abstract justice is a concept on no one's mind, while getting what one "deserves" is at the forefront of everyone's agenda. As each struggles to get what they deserve and use each incident to further their own objectives, it becomes clear that "reality" is constructed by a mash-up of disconnected people pursuing their disconnected motives simultaneously, and justice plays no part. An interesting book!
Great story about urban greed; social, financial and civic power grabs; still fresh, absurd and funny twenty-five years after publication.
1) Peter Fallow 2) Reverend Bacon 3) Tommy Killian
This was a brilliant narration by Joe Barrett - he brought to life an astonishing variety of characters and accents, making this as a superbly enjoyable way of experiencing this classic, Regan-era American novel.
An absolutely brilliant performance of an absurdly compelling story. Even Carly Simon couldn't bring this human foible to light any better. Makes you wonder what would any verdict be "in foro conscientiae" (epilog).
Business owner , philanthropist.
You feel for the main character after awhile, even though he is a jerk. It had some good observations of the justice system that were defiantly good. Just few and far between.
Those who are more interested in racial or economic politics. Or men.
Not necessarily. I just couldn't connect to the characters.
Joe does an EXCELLENT job. His dialects are almost flawless and each character has a very distinct voice so I rarely got confused about who was speaking.
It was very thorough. The author did not leave out any details.
Tom Wolfe is obviously a good writer, just incredibly verbose. His descriptions go on and on, sometimes at the expense of the plot or character development. After a while, I just wanted to say, "Get on with it!"