Yes -- Nassim's book is not necessarily easy to follow, but that is only because he has dedicated his life to this concept, and I've only learned of it from the first pass through the book.
When I realized my own turkey moment -- In June 1996, while stationed in Saudi Arabia, I was injured in a terrorist bombing of our Air Force barracks. Without dying, this was as close as I've come to being the turkey, but more importantly, in realizing that while this represented a black swan event in my life, it would not be viewed as one by the world.
Theodore Roosevelt's "The Man in the Arena" & Raise High the Roof Beam Carpenters: Po Lo's account of the dun-colored mare @deadgametheory
The Black Swan is one of the best books I had read in years, and so I wanted to be able to listen to it as well. I thought that the narration was excellent, and listening to it several times seemed to better prepare me for the way in which Nassim Taleb reconstructs and further refines his ideas for AntiFragile.
The only works that I know of are Nassim Taleb's other work. Fooled By Randomness and The Black Swan become reference material to be looked back upon after hearing AntiFragile.
Realizing how oblivious most of us are in regard to the exposure we have to "rare" events.
I listened to it in a very compressed amount of time, but I had already read it, and given quite a bit of thought. It is certainly really engaging.
Really a tremendously good investment of my time.
While a bit disjointed in the order of delivery, the author has a VERY valid thesis that is often overlooked in the American culture's view of what the world should look like... a hard listen for some, but a key point to remember for all business men & warriors.
The good: Taleb discusses some very interesting ideas. He is able to clearly articulate some abstract thoughts that I had sorta circled around in the past, but was never able to truly grasp or explain. The core ideas he states are the kind that can actually change your perspective of the world.
The bad: He is very pretentious and self-indulgent. Take this particular quote for example: "This argument, known as Hempel's raven paradox, was rediscovered by my friend the (thinking) mathematician Bruno Dupire during one of our intense meditating walks in London—one of those intense walk-discussions, intense to the point of our not noticing the rain. He pointed to a red Mini and shouted, 'Look, Nassim, look! No Black Swan!'". Apparently, he's so enlightened that he getting rained on doesn't even register with him? And he says this as a casual aside. Keep in mind, this anecdote kinda comes out of nowhere, is never brought up again, and doesn't even really illustrate the point he's trying to make. It's just obnoxious. There are a few different things like this too: he name drops obscure philosophers as though the average reader will be familiar with them, he lists a series of thoughts in Latin (saying "primo, secondo, terso" instead of "first, second, third"), brings up cocktail parties as though they're a weekly occurrence for most people, and so on. Weirdly, he insults people who are pretentious several times in the book.
In another bit of irony, he rallies against platonicities (basically, concepts that oversimplify more complicated and abstract realities). Yet, throughout the book, he invents dozens of new terms that seem to be oversimplifying things.
The narrator, for better or worse, seems to match the author's tone. He's very droll and tends to come off dismissive of others.
The book is all over the place. First, it's about him growing up in Lebanon, then he discusses a historical event, then he's using one metaphor, then another. There's a story he, at first, presents as though it was an actual account of author. Then a chapter later, he says it isn't. Then, he calls back to an earlier metaphor. It goes from math to philosophy to economics. It all becomes a blur. This book made me appreciate the writing of Malcolm Gladwell a lot more.
Overall: if you're very interested, check it out. I would recommend Nate Silver's "The Signal and the Noise" or something by Malcolm Gladwell before this though.
The tiny shards of real insight are lost in the ocean of pseudo-intellectual windbaggery.
No. There are great ones out there.
The author? Heh.
I'd like to listen to the Black Swan one more time to drive home some points that I didn't take note of the first time through - I'll definitely listen on a faster than normal narration speed, though.
The idea of true uncertainty, our compulsion to explain it in simple retrospective stories, and our inherent limitations has changed my perspective of our world.
David Chandler comes across as if he were the author of the Black Swan - he seems to care deeply about the material, and portrays the author's point of view. After seeing Nassim Nicholas Taleb give a speech online, however, I do think Chandler is a bit more over the top than the author would have done himself.
This is a well thought out book - thank you for taking time to write this, Mr. Taleb.
I love the ideas contained in this book - they are unique relative to my academic background, and well worth covering in some depth beyond how they are covered in this book. The author's style seems a bit pompous at times, but it doesn't detract from the main ideas.
My biggest gripe with the book is the constant self referencing that occurs through the book. In one chapter he'll tell you about learning more in another chapter, or he'll tell you he'll go into more detail later, or he'll give you a name of a behavior that will be discussed later. I would have preferred to experience the ideas in a more natural environment. I feel that the author was trying to cover more material than could reasonably fit into this book - something like a trailer for a movie does when trying to fit a much longer novel's worth of material into a specific length of time.
David Chandler was very engaging in this book.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb views on the Black Swan phenomenon were eye-opening. Just because you only see white swan does not mean that all swans are white. This book explains that not all events are predictable.Great read!
I thought I was getting an interesting analysis of long tail risk issues. I got an incoherent rambling set of anecdotes that are fiction (but not clearly disclosed as such) in some sort of pseudo-Socratic philosopher format. I loved books like "The Big Short" and "The Greatest Trade Ever"...this was not like those books. This was one of the very few audible books I have ever not finished. To be clear, I listened to most of it. The concept is great: unexpected events happen more often that you would think. However, that is the extent of the insight of this book. It is not about finance.
Was really hoping to enjoy this, but just couldn't get into it. Love research in this niche and typically burn through them, feeling as though I've come away better educated about human behavior, decision-making, and situational influences. This book jumped all over the place, was a little self-aggrandizing, and quickly became a chore to get through. Costs outweighed benefits, and I called it a day.