Love Star Trek
A wonderful mystery with a dark and complex plot in the middle of Sweden’s countryside. The quite ambience and its slow story tempo were a 180 degree turn from my usual fair of vampires and mayhem. In spite of or maybe because of that I found myself getting sucked into Wallander’s careful examinations and contemplation of the mystery and his life. I don’t think I will be devouring this series like I usually do with a new found series. Instead I’ll save them and read only when the mood strikes.
I heard there is a TV series based on this. I’d love to see it.
Once again Mankell has transported me from my mundane life to one of adventure and pathos. From Africa to Sweden. The amazing thing is the personal life of detective Wallander so parallels the lives that people in his age group are experiencing at this moment in time. Family problems, parents ill and dying, adult children without direction, divorce, searching for meaning and love, being under appreciated for the work they do, and along side this he weaves an enthralling mystery that keeps you involved with the plot. A Great Writer and a great Book.
Really got into the story, but didn't like the narrator - lots of odd pauses and just a hard voice for me to listen to so ended up in this place where I just wanted to hurry up and get to the end not only so I could figure out the mystery, but so I wouldn't have to listen to that voice anymore.
I've liked Mankell's other books much more than this one. The story is good, but I found it went on for too long. The narrator got on my nerves a bit. He made several noises, chuckling, exasperated blowing, and for one fellow he devised a slow, almost stutter-like voice. Maybe the script said that the guy was that way early in the book. But, he was a minor character. Tolerable enough to get to the end to find out whodunit.
I love to read but don't have much time so, listening to books has become a necessary passion. If I can't read, I'll listen and it makes mundane things like driving long distances and cleaning house bearable.
I think I would have liked this book better if I had actually read it instead of listened to it. It has all the elements of a mystery that I like, relatable characters, twists and turns. But, I just can't get over Dick Hill's voice. It's a generally agreeable voice but his portrayal of female characters is absolutely grating to me. He uses a very nasal, slightly higher than his own voice, squeal and it sounds almost like he's doing an offensive mock of some female he doesn't like.
I've listened to other books he's narrated and felt the same way. Had I paid attention to who the narrator was when I was just checking it out, I wouldn't have bought it.
This was my first Mankell mystery and I completely enjoyed it. I love the characters, particularly the hero detective. The narration is deadpan but you quickly stop paying attention to it as you are eager to hear what happens next. Nice integration of a bit of social commentary and a perspective about contemporary politics.
Love having someone read me a story. Fires in the hearth, rain on the roof, sunny days and surf. Good friends, good food and J S Bach.
Dick Hill's reading, reminds me this is a Swedish novel.It is not English or American. It is translated. A lot of nuance is lost in language translation. It is not 2009, but 1994. Think of policing outside mobile phones and DNA testing and computer profiles. Policing at the beginning of information available on computers, policing in a relatively small community, policing by people who still have a life outside policing, are explored in this story
The pace alters from the start where many avenues are considered to the closing very fast action..
The fast pace at the end had me going back, to listen again, because I had missed a piece. Without knowing, I tend to think in many ways that this story reflects the reports that police have to write. Often as I hear the story unfold, in my minds eye I see a written report. More I have the contact with the officer's thoughts and feelings as the case gathers momentum.
It is provocative, not only in questioning Justice, but also in questioning changes in society values.
This is the first book I did not finish. It is horrible. I am the easiest to please in this genre and I found myself turning to the news in the car for more excitment. The plot takes forever to get going and is boring. Also the narration is brutal. It is filled with ridiculous banter between characters that is a complete waste. Blah!!
This mystery is paced so slowly and has so little action or character development, that it is the opposite of suspense or intrigue. I had no interest in finishing the story. Mystery writer who give away the identity of the murder in the beginning, run a high risk of loosing their readers/listeners. The inspector spends most of his time going over and over what he doesn't know while the "in the know" reader is wondering when he and his dull witted staff will put the 2+2 together. Definitely not recommended. A mystery needs much better use of language and local color - his lack luster depiction of both Africa and locations of Sweden were drab, boring, and without any specificity or flair.