York does a great job with some great material. Some of his character delivery could be a bit grating, but I think that was on purpose much of the time.
Probably not Huxley, but York's performance is fine.
The discussion of the birth process and facilities.
I suppose, but it was rather heavy handed.
The story loses its originality near the end, with the introduction of the savage. It seems disjointed and unrelated to the first half of the book. I lost interest, but listened to the rather predictable end.
Brave New World is imaginative since it was written before WWII and is very accurate in predicting technologies that would come after it. The novel is lacking in a dramatic story. It is great as commentary and speculation of possible dystopian or utopian ideals. Even with everything that happens to all of the characters, none of them seem fleshed out and the story constantly jumps between them to illustrate different societal issues. If you like philosophical books this story is a classic and a must listen. Like in the society that is described, the characters are small pieces in the over arching ideal of describing the setting. If you don't mind that, then this book is well worth reading.
Must admit, I grabbed this one: 1) because for some reason I'd never read it in high school or college and thought I "should," and 2) the classics were a two-for-one sale. But, I was skeptical about listening to a classic. Is that even allowed? Is it appropriate? Should it be done?! Well, duh! Of course. Excellent decision on my part!
So the story? Wonderfully entertaining, of course. Also, creepily pertinent to today's world of "take a pill" to cure what ails you and the potential for science and good intentions to run amok.
The narrator? He was fabulous! I loved, loved, LOVED his characters. He did a stuffy British bureaucrat so well, it had me laughing. He was what a good narrator should be -- he didn't interfere, he just disappeared into the story.
I recommend this classic, and anything else by this narrator.
When I first listened to this reading of A Brave New World -- not having read it in 20 or 30 years -- I was actually very disappointed. Later, I stumbled upon some comparisons of ABNW and 1984 and was confused a bit by the possibility that some people consider the former the "better" book. So, I tried again and I realized that it was totally the preformance of the book that put me off. The narration of this edition comes across as too much Monty Python for my tastes and I wanted a darker more ominous delivery.
I don't think there is anything necessarily wrong with the narration, many reviewers have raves for Michael York. It just isn't what I imagine in my own mind and it bothered me and threw me off for most of the book. So I came away thinking ABNW was a really bad book but it isn't, it is a great book, just delivered here with, to my mind, a grating style.
The interesting take away for me is understanding the impact a narrator has on the quality and feel of a book, kind of obvious really. The difference for me is that the quality of the narration is good but it just does't suit the book -- if that makes sense. Maybe I'm just a dummy for having to listen to 800 books before realizing that :D
Still, I highly recommend this wonderful book with its "interesting" choice of narration.
There is always a freedom for me in reading and conjuring even the accent given to certain phrases that will make the reading of a print version of any book a slightly more enjoyable experience than a spoken or audio edition; that being said, Michael York is a more than capable actor and narrator and effectively brings the characters to life... well done.
John the savage strikes me as the one truly honest person in the story, and his innocence betrays him in the midst of the altered reality of the other main characters and society of the BNW
Bernard Marx - Michael York shows his fragilities very well I felt
It certainly has that page turner feel... yes!
A Brave New World has the haunting feeling of an all-too-possible scenario; frightening in the insistent prospect of how convincingly a new order might be propagated on an entire social set or populace; yet refreshing in the sense of the likelihood that a John Savage will also emerge no matter what... so all is not completely doomed. Enjoy...
Very clever story. Huxley's depth of knowledge of religion, philosophy and society provides a great foundation for his dystopian tale, where happiness has become more important than individuality and self-determination. Funny and sarcastic while being appallingly prescient. I've read it twice in print and it gets better (as I understand it better) each time.
All of them. He does an excellent job of giving each character his or her own voice. His professionalism as an actor shines.
It is a bit long for that. I did it in about three sessions. It is dense enough that you might want to digest for a bit after a couple of hours before you 'read' more.
Don't miss this book!
It's hard to believe it's been well over half a century since this book was first published. It's important to read and understand. This should be a cautionary tale about those who want to control us. I see parallels in modern advertising to much of this book. It's well read and very enjoyable.
This is my first audiobook and a very good one at that .
The arguments of the savage against a society without love , passion , and the revelations that come to ourselves from the hardships we endure are good reminders of why indiviualality is a virtue to pusue , keep and hold on to .
not yet , but very satisfied .
The remorse , disgust , and anger the savage felt after the death of his mother towards himself and a society that cannot understand and appreciate the ups and downs of life .
This is one of my favorite books of all time. The narrator was pretty good, consistent. That's about all I have to say without either repeating the description or spoiling it for someone who has not read this before.