It was not told as a story.
Yes, I think that the characters should have had dialogue and then had different readers for each character.
I got bored. It was a documentary, listing facts and names. I like a story.
Can I trade this for something else?
The text, while interesting, tends to be repetitive. The narrator consistently errs in inflection and has a monotonous voice.
Yes, to read, not to listen to.
Annette Gordon Reed begins this book perfectly: let's believe the stories black slaves told of their lives and experiences just as we believe those of white slaveholders. The book is deeply engaging. In telling the story of the Hemings family, you see the early history of America in a truer light - more disturbing - but rings very true.
This was a story that America will never forget nor should it be able to forget. Americas present race relation problem stems from this negative past. This story puts a lot in perspective. For me, it was quite an educational moment.
This book is a thorough study of history that has had to be pieced together and inferred, because so few documents exist. I found it fascinating, relevant and revealing--history of our country, that many white people, like myself, are unaware of.
This is a non-fiction book. My favorite characters are all the black people who were so important to the development of America, but whose history is unwritten, hidden and invisible.
Rather mechanical, could have more color in her voice.
No, but I enjoyed listening it every night for a month.
Some people have commented that the book could have been edited better. But in retrospect, after hearing the whole story, I appreciate very much having all the background information possible. It makes it all fit together.
The author has a challenging job because there are no written records by the Hemmingses at the time. The oral stories handed down to succeeding generations are backed up by considerable research from others who left journals and letters, as well as newspaper articles and other period records. I found it a bit irritating to be told repeatedly what someone (who left no records) would have felt in the given circumstances, but I found the solid information helpful in understanding the whole situation.
I listened to the entire book (parts of it several times because I kept falling asleep). The "story" of "history" made the details bearable.How peculiar it is to learn that Jefferson planned careers for his slaves, from barber to carpenter to French chef. The government machinations, even at the founding of our country, reverberate in our own times.
The narration is deplorable, with many complex terms mispronounced. I also found it a bit whiney. As another reviewer suggested, putting it on a faster speed makes it more bearable overall.
When I finished the book, I wandered through a website of the Thomas Jefferson Foundation. It was interesting to find out that the Foundation has accepted the Hemmingses as descendants of Jeffereson because DNA tests strongly support it. They also have quite a collection of narratives, some from white descendents of the Hemmingses.
This book is too important to miss. It adds many pieces to the puzzle of US history, creating a total picture which would be difficult to find in other sources. Mow the lawn, do dishes, put it on double speed, do whatever it takes, but get through it. You'll be glad you did.
Trying to understand how slavery became a Southern legal institution is essential to understanding American history.The author attempts this arduous task by revealing the relationship of two families through four generations, one black, another white. The Hemings and the Jeffersons were entangled long before Sally Hemings came into Thomas Jefferson's life. Sally was the half-sister of Thomas Jefferson's deceased wife--a mind-boggling thought the author tries to articulate. This audible book is as fascinating as the book and is narrated well. One criticism: the author keeps explaining again and again how we need to realize attitudes were different during the formation of the Jamestown colony. That is pretty obvious, although I don't remember thinking that as I read the book. However, all sides of the slavery issue are presented, including philosophical questions of the fact that the United States permitted slavery while proclaiming itself a democracy. The best part is the "love" story between Jefferson and Sally Hemings. Why didn't Sally remain in Paris instead of going back with Jefferson as his slave? Did she regret her choice? Why did Jefferson make a "treaty" with Sally to "free" her adult children? Did Jefferson love Sally or is it impossible to love someone you legally own? The answers are not fully resolved because scholars simply don't know, but the questions are intriguing and thought-provoking.
I had wanted to read this book since it was first published, and I'm so glad I was able to get it as an audiobook. I learned SO MUCH about U.S. history and 18th-century Western societies. Gordon-Reed does so well at contextualizing the people about whom she writes, their actions, and their expectations, that I felt I had a very reliable conduit to the time in which the Hemings family lived and worked and was enslaved at Monticello. I'm impressed that she creates such a lively narrative without, as far as I can tell, embellishing or creating dialogue.
Listening to the whole work is a commitment. I stretched my listening over several months, but never lost the thread of the story. This is probably because of the many repetitions of the same concepts throughout the book, but, as Lenin said, "povtorenie -- mat' ucheniia" -- repetition is the mother of learning. I certainly found these repetitions more helpful than annoying.
The author has done tremendous research and opened my eyes to the real slave world of plantation owners and Thomas Jefferson. The concepts of slavery and the use of slave women to procreate more slaves and half brothers and sisters to the owners families is mind bending. Sally Hemings is led to a choice of freedom in Europe or enslavement in Monticello. Jefferson is fortunate that she chose to remain with him.
Jefferson, a man of letters and distinguished American, cannot see that slavery makes the Declaration of Independence, a hypocritical document.
Although the author goes off in many tangents from the principle story and bogs it down, it remains a tremendous piece of literature on the enslaved.