This book is very good. The subject matter is contested in some circles, but it is very thought provoking. I'd recommend reading the book rather than listening as some passages will have you hitting the reverse button on your player.
This is an excellent book, as is also Collapse by the same author. But it is a good example of a book that is, IMHO, unsuited for audiobook format.
The premise of the book is fascinating and it started out with great promise ... but soon lapsed into a pretty rudimentary review of human history, travel, and evolution. I stopped and started it a lot because it became a bit dull towards the middle. In the end, I don't feel like the author really answered the question he set out to answer. Maybe there was just too much hype ...
This book has many interesting points and observations. However, there are several sections that you just have to endure. Keep with it and it will be worth your while. The narrator is ok, but not very exciting - this makes the slower parts of the book go even slower...
This book presents the theory that geography and distribution of resources, not genetics, is responsible for the vast disparity in wealth that we see today.
The author presents his argument thoroughly and I certainly learned a few things from this book.
Unfortunately, I also found it quite tedious in parts; I remember a seemingly endless recitation of different crops and their development in different parts of the world. By 3/4 of the way through I was contemplating skipping the rest.
Perhaps I lack sufficient interest in this topic. I nonetheless will probably try his other book (about why societies fail IIRC) when it comes out on Audible.
Though feeling good about Diamond's agreement to some of the principles of my book, "The Evolution Diet," I was feeling fairly unimpressed throughout "Guns, Germs, and Steel." The title, seemingly influenced by more appropriately named books by Marvin Harris like "Cannibals and Kings," and "Cows, Pigs, Wars, and Witches," attempts to clump together things that wouldn't normally be clumped together. In this case, it doesn't really work- some are reasons for why certain cultures thrived, but another is a result. This inconsistency indicates what becomes clear throughout the book, Diamond really doesn't have a strong point.
Sure, Diamond shows how certain foods allowed for the rapid growth of population that was needed for advanced civilizations and comes up with insightful reasons for success like wide East-West expansion in Eurasia, but not in the Americas and Africa. However, Diamond misses the single-most important factor in why some cultures advanced and others didn't: trade. Sure he grazes over the idea and pretty much offers the proof when he shows why Australian peoples failed to thrive despite having enough natural resources. Trade explains why the multicultural and highly populated Eurasian peoples excelled and the others didn't. The proof is seen in the capitals of advanced civilizations, which, throughout history were located at the center of trade routes (the Fertile Crescent, Egypt, Greece, Rome, Arabia, then France, Holland, and England, and eventually America).
Another irksome tendency in "Guns" is Diamond's racial labeling, which is common elsewhere, but brought to the forefront in this book, which focuses on the differences between races.
Overall, "Guns," reveals a fairly insightful look at the history of humans and how cultures got to their respective levels of advancement, but misses the most obvious reason for it throughout. Because of this, Diamond squanders a great opportunity.
Based on its popularity and high reviews, I expected alot from this book. I was disappointed in that it was dully read, and the material was repetitive. There's a lot of space filled by lists, and I learned less than I hoped.
The author seemed to have attention deficit disorder in the way he jumped from topic to topic, region to region, time period to time period, with no apparent attempt at organization or data supporting his argument that all cultures in the world are equally intelligent and productive and that differences in cultural living standards was caused by geographic barriers rather than the aptitudes of individuals within a culture who survived and flourished.
He even argues that if we took the most primitive aboriginal societies today and transplanted them to an advanced society (like Silicon Valley, Ca?) that they would flourish equally well and be as inventive, productive and intelligent in a short period of time. The physical geography of Papau New Guinea is the main impediment to their success today vs the lack of aptitude for modern day societal success.
Totally bizarre, as are most of his other arguments in the book if you can even follow the thesis in this totally disjointed historical analysis.
Nothng by this author. I'm going to ask for a Credit return from audible because this was such a useless listen.
Hard for anyone to narrate this book with a straight face/tone
All of it. Stop selling it.
One of the biggest wastes of my time in years of audible membership. Anyone with a background in history, evolution and psychology etc would spot this biased and politically motivated author within the first few minutes. Others who are not well read may think this book's thesis has something to do with reality.