I gave up. The Romans got to me. Everything you read, or will read, on the Roman Chapters is true. Bring us the Irish for crying out loud. The Roman section could have been summarized. It in deed necessary to establish the fall the Empire and the role of the Irish, but the author is clearly indulging himself with little consideration for his readers.
The slow pace of the reading doesn't help. I had it on fast speed (x 2) and still I dozed off a few times.
I may take it up again if I find where the Irish enter the stage.
Artist, farmer, avid reader. I am interested in all sorts of things; history, religions, psychology, cultures, travel, politics and more.
the performance was stiff and slow
disappointment- I was so looking forward to more history for my course of study
Listening to "How the Irish Saved Civilization" or watching paint dry?...tough choice
Diction teacher. His pronunciation was so clipped that it took away any enjoyment of hearing the story. No conversation quality at all. It was a story, so relax and tell the story. His voice was so distracting, I stopped listening to it and moved on to another book.
No. I just wish that I could preview the narrator before buying.
Both the dramatic and clipped diction and the timbre of his voice were distracting from teh story. This fellow is not a storyteller.
Didn't get far enough into it to hear a character.
This book seems not to know what it was supposed to be about. It rambles pointlessly. I've suffered through half of this book. I can't stand to listen to any more of it so I'll never know if it gets any better. I want those wasted hours of my life returned.
The Great Courses series never disappoints.
The audio quality was poor.
DO NOT PURCHASE.
No. The cadence and parsing didn't seem to fit many of the sentences. I found it helped to turn the speed up to 1.25x, but that was mostly to get through it.
It would have been nice to have the chapters of the book match the chapters in Audible.
I would not recommend this version -- the reader is overly dramatic and the author too self indulgent. The story is interesting and deserves a good editor and better reader.
I like long books, so I chose the 8 hour version and regretted it the first day. Still, in the long slog thru this there are fascinating facts and perspectives.
I'm Irish, and this book is dreadful. First, the performance is utterly comical and becomes very tiring to listen to after a while. Second, this is really a book about the classics of western literature, not a history book. That is, this a book about literature which will be difficult to engage or enjoy for anybody not already well versed in the major works of the western cannon such as The Confessions of St. Augustine. Finally, so much time is spent on figures such as Saint Augustine of Hippo (North Africa) that one cannot even really say How the Irish Saved Civilization is a book about Ireland. Rather, this feels like a book by a professor who knows more than you do and wants to show it off. It's title is magnificent and was probably the major driver of sales. I suspect that few readers will make it to the end of this book, however.
I listen to a lot of audiobooks.
I love this book and have read it before. I thought I would download it to listen to while I'm at work since I enjoyed it so much. The narrator is awful. He reads with a strange slowness and sounds like he has marbles in his mouth, or something...I keep picture him foaming at the mouth. yuk.
Have Derek Jacobi read this and I'll buy it again.
The book was an interesting exploration of Roman literature, the life of St Patrick, and monastic life in Ireland, but I am still at a loss as to how exactly he reckons that the Irish saved civilization. Although he stresses that Irish monks travelled widely through Europe in the Dark Ages, the are no concrete examples of texts that are traced from the ancient world through Ireland back to the mainland. There should be dozens of good expamples if his thesis is correct.
Having also read "Sailing the Wine Dark Sea" it seems like the author's style is very airy and authoritative. He tells you what he thinks about an idea and doesn't feel the need to provide references or detailed proofs. I suppose he is correct about much of what he says, but I can't just take his word for it.
The writing is interesting and funny, but I also found the narration a bit "Masterpiece Theater" as other reviewers have pointed out.