I've read many similar books including mindless eating, good calories bad calories, in defense of food, jungle effect, fat chance, and rethinking thin. I put this book at the bottom for usefulness and also at the bottom for insight. I think most obese and formerly obese people already suspected that fat, sugar, and salt taste good. This book spends a lot of time demonizing the food industry for creating delicious food. Similar yet much better book is Mindless Eating. That book looks into how habits, not just the taste of food, lead to overeating. It gives suggestions such as the size of your plate mattering, keeping the candies 6 feet away from your desk vs next to it, waiting 20 minutes between refills, and using taller glasses rather than wide short ones. The studies for these recommendations are entertaining, clever, and scientifically sound. I've lost 20 percent of my body weight following many of the principles of Mindless Eating and now have the same BMI as Bob Harper (biggest loser trainer), and kept it for almost two years now. I was formerly obese for 15 years. I still eat fat and salt, but not much sugar. I have my life again, and have become the health guru at work. Good luck to all dieters.
Due to the title of this book, my expectation was that I would get a better solution to the problem than what was offered in this book. I gave it two stars rather than one because a small portion of the book had some interesting info. But, if you are looking for a difinitive solution, look elsewhere!!
Addicted to Audible since 2009
I liked this book a lot but I won't know how good it really is until I try to put some of the tips in it to use. If it helps me lose just a little weight, it will be worth it!
The author really could do a lot to make it more relevant to everyone. Instead of putting application at the end, he should have a bit of it at the end of each chapter.
Thought it would be a boring repeat of Omnivores Dilemma, but there is even more to our food industry that we must face. This is much better documented by a very knowledgeable scientist. (I'm glad the FDA just took a stand on regular antibiotics in feedlots, but the compromise taken is expected to initially raise antibiotic use based on European experience.)
This book is worth the read, or listen as the case may be. The information is enlightening and makes sense once you hear it. The challenge is to make the appropriate changes once you have the information. Five stars is probably over rating this, but just slightly. I want people to know it is worthwhile.
Loved it!!! It wasn't just about overeating, it's so informative about the food we eat, where it comes from, and how our minds work when we think about food. I will never think about food the same way.
I learn better by listening than reading. This book provided a lot of evidence and information that I don't think I would have been patient enough to read. Having someone read it to me was perfect. And in audio form, it is useful to be able to replay some of the suggestions for breaking bad habits and creating good ones. Important information about how we are being manipulated by food companies was presented -- and good coaching was provided on how to fight back.
What I liked about this non-fiction work was that the case was convincingly made about how and why we eat addictive foods that are layered with sugar, fat and salt -- and then strategies were presented as to how to we can arm ourselves against those luring messages.
As a book of non-fiction, there was only a narrator.
This book made me think about how we as a society overindulge, how I succumb, and encouraged the reader to rethink our behaviors and initiate change to more healthful behaviors. It made me angry at companies for exploiting us -- and angry at myself and society for being such ignorant and willing victims.
The narration is great. The information is good. Too much time was focused on research findings and what this or that expert had to say to support the same handful of key points. These key points foscused on why we over eat. More time should have been spent on what to do about it.