This was my first Kurt Vonnegut book, print or audio.
I really liked it. BUT I can see were It would not be for everyone. The writing style might be to confusing or weird for everyone.
I would defiantly read/listen to another one of his books, when I'm in the right mood.
The story was well developed and I didn't know how it was going to end , well till the end. I found myself laughing out loud sometimes, and other times mouthing "what the f$%k".
I work full time in Financial Services, teach part time, listen to music (a lot) and love Science Fiction and Speculative Fiction.
In some respects yes. Comedic elements are sometimes better when told. This book has comedic elements that are so funny that listening to them make them even more side splitting.
Oh geez...tough one....I would say Kilgore Trout. The name itself, based on Theodore Sturgeon is funny enough but the characterization of a prolific, unread writer is so clever. He appears in several KVJ novels, but this is the one that is the most memorable (to me).
I thought he was great. I honestly am a little put off when I see a famous actor as an Audible Reader (not sure why), but he did a spectacular job. Maybe I think a "name actor" will over act or be too much. He was great.
Movies ruin good books. I hope it is not made into a movie....
This story arch is where Vonnegut gets his reputation as an innovative writer. I am sure others have done it but not with this style. He deconstructs his characters, until they are not characters at all but self described literary devices for his story. He also uses meta-language to talk about himself and his own work in a way that pulls other novels into this story. This is a post modern approach that supports KVJ's reputation as an innovative, great American writer. It is profound, irreverent, bawdy, provocative and utterly entertaining.
Stop listening to other people's opinions and form one of your own. That's sound advice, or not. It all depends on how literal you take it.
I will say that I do like Kurt Vonnegut's style and more than a handful of his books. His way of writing is like an old friend with sad news that will tell it to you straight. The story itself was Ah... hard to determine.
I liked certain parts. I liked the writing, but the story feels as though it's missing something. It's interesting, but there is something missing.... I don't know what it is.
Am I glad I listened to it?
Will I again sometime in the future.
Is it just me?
Very funny pieces/parts. Some of this made me laugh so hard it hurt. But as much as I wanted to love this book, I found my mind wandering many times. The back and forth of the teller, not the performer, kept losing my interest.
I love the way this book describes the world like a tour book for the planet.
Champions is a very Vonnegutty book. Its got all of the character depth with the coincidence and great dialogue.
My favorite scene in the book is when Killgore Trout is traveling with the truck driver and the truck driver is asking him questions about house siding. Its small and paced, but it really shows Trout in ways the other books haven't. He is more of a character and less of a caricature.
This is a silly question, but Vonnegut himself is the best character in the book. He portrays himself as a sloppy god figure. Who wouldn't want to get Italian food with a Godlike Vonnegut?
On a whim, and based on the high ratings that this book received, I purchased Breakfast of Champions. I have never read or listened to any of Kurt Vonnegut's books. But now, after having listened to this book, I am sure that I never will again. The writing is well written, but the characters are too eccentric and uninteresting to me (I'm sure fans of the author will disagree). I've heard that his fans are loyal (maybe the reason why this book's ratings are high), but listen to the sample first before purchasing.
I've read other Vonnegut books and have enjoyed them but I had to admit to myself this one wasn't very good. He lightly touched on some of the concepts of earlier books and touched once again on a lot of the things wrong with society as it exists - but those were kept to a minimum. The book was essentially 90% setup and only 10% delivery - the Definition of Anticlimactic.
And that's why I didn't like it - too much setup....very little delivery.
"Programming is an art form that fights back"
Im sure Ill be told I just "dont get it", but I dont. I understand what Kurt was saying, but the book was so horribly boring and disconnected. It sounded like the transcript of a heavily sedated crash victim's dream.